Currently viewing and reading

Related Post

214 Comments Received

Mike
July 15th, 2008 @5:42 am  

Um why did you rename number 9? There is word ‘little’ in the toys name.

admin
July 15th, 2008 @5:46 am  

Dunno why - have changed it now..thanks for pointing that out Mike

Hoof
July 15th, 2008 @7:57 am  

Nice collection! I think most of them point to times that have gone by when they were not considered racist at all. By the white folks, that is :)

admin
July 15th, 2008 @8:02 am  

Hi Hoof

thanks for your kind comments!

I think you make a great point. These toys were seen as fun! I think that is what shock me most of all.

For Christs sake - a donkey kicking a black mans head in! How could this be deemed a toy!

rick
July 15th, 2008 @8:28 am  

I am so glad we live in a time where (at least in the US) there is some equality. These toys are all very disrespectful. It was only 35 years ago that civil rights laws were brought to what the constitution states.

Luke H
July 15th, 2008 @8:38 am  

It’s an interesting collection from a social and a historical perspective. Toys such as “Greedy Nigger Boy” (I feel guilty about just *typing* those words) are so clearly vehicles for spreading hate that you have to expand your definition of what a toy is.

Is it possible that a toy is also a way for adults to perpetuate their own views and prejudices? I think it is.

It is not really controversial any longer to argue that giving girls toy ovens and dolls, for example, is a way of reinforcing gender roles. This collection shows me that toys can also serve to reinforce racial prejudice.

I must admit to being a little offended to see these toys presented here but perhaps I should not be so sensitive. You are not, afterall, condoning or approving of these objects. You are just displaying them as interesting artifacts. Still, I wouldn’t blame someone for feeling offended at seeing such reminders of violently racist former times.

Seeing these toys reminds me of the “Coon Chicken” poster in the film Ghost World. The poster which is presented as “found art” but ends up causing problems for everyone associated with it as they become scapegoats for the towns disgust at its’ own dirty little secret - a history of racism.

hot chop
July 15th, 2008 @9:50 am  

So how do the “chop suey specs” manage to amuse?…

you racist!

Glenn
July 15th, 2008 @10:00 am  

I would really LOVE to get a pair of chop suey specs - they would be hilarious and would have all of my non-racist friends and family pissing themselves laughing.

MR
July 15th, 2008 @10:14 am  

Intolerance is a part of every generation. Before we get too self-righteous, I’m sure some future generation will look back at our day and find us pathetic too. It’s popular right now to bash older white males and blame them for all the troubles in the world. If someone produces a toy called a Greedy CEO featuring a white guy in a business suit, would that be a stereotype? Would it be included on this list? How about a McCain sock puppet? I’m not condoning the toys listed above; they are offensive, but remember, not everything we believe to be right will stand the test of time.

BobS
July 15th, 2008 @10:14 am  

Why is it okay to refer to the current president as a monkey but not one of the presidential hopefuls? Please answer that question without mentioning race/ethnicity because, after all, we are beyond that rubbish.

Marius
July 15th, 2008 @10:26 am  

Funny, nowadays it’s cool to use that much spite against “rednecks”, abortion protesters et al. I guess the hate and spite itself isn’t the problem it’s who is on the receiving end.

Packson
July 15th, 2008 @11:15 am  

Sadly these are not that shocking, as I live in the Southeast. I can go to any antique store and pick up a “Greedy Nigger,” “Golly Wog,” or any black person-watermelon toy. They are still manufactured.

Paul
July 15th, 2008 @12:11 pm  

How are the number 2 item the goggles with the slitty eyes “Racist” in any shape or form? Putting on the glasses to pretend you’re oriental is no different to taking on the aspects of anyone elses features.

Strangely enough a lot of orientals have slitty eyes as the goggles depict, its a genetic thing anyone can see that so making a toy to look like someone elses features and assuming its racist? Sorry but thats a rediculous statement.

Thats like someone from sweden putting on a black coloured wig and being called racist against africans. Picking on people with black skin specifically and creating a game where the actions are particularly nasty is a bit different, it infers some hatred towards a certain race for seemingly no other reason than their differences, the goggles however dont really strike me as promoting hatred towards anything.

Also number 7, hitlers limo… racist? Yeah right.
Racist against who in what possible way? Hitler’s limo running over a moulded road of dying jew’s possibly but just hitler in car? Give me a break.

We had golly wogs around when I was a kid and it never struck me as actually inferring any hatred towards black people either. I’ve got the sense to realise black people have darker skin because genetically they’ve evolved in a hotter country with a higher level of sunlight, the gollywogs were just black frizzy haired puppets, plus they’re smiling. I dont see what racial hatred they are intended to stir up but thats just my opinion.

The one’s im more bothered about are the items that throw around common use of the N word which a lot of black people obviously find extremely offensive, also the ones that clearly depict violence towards other races for fun. Bottom line is people are black, yellow, white, have different features, slitty eyes, big noses.

There is no harm or racist vibes in admitting this and accepting it, it’s when the features are used in a degrading manner or the notion put forward that they are somehow inferior to other races because of it.

Never be scared to say what something is, call it by its name.

alexb
July 15th, 2008 @12:21 pm  

the metta tags for the sock obama though have been recalled are still

sock monkeys, politically plush dolls, obama doll, obama monkey, the sock obama, monkey obama, John Mccain

donal h.
July 15th, 2008 @12:22 pm  

I don’t understand why you seem to be “shocked” at most of the black ones (and even include a relatively harmless hitler one) but are “amused” by #2. Personally I find them all somewhat amusing but was just wondering why it would be more acceptable to express amusement at that one except that you’re more afraid of blacks.

alexb
July 15th, 2008 @12:25 pm  

why is this comment not showing up?

the metta tags for the sock obama though have been recalled are still

sock monkeys, politically plush dolls, obama doll, obama monkey, the sock obama, monkey obama, John Mccain

Gern
July 15th, 2008 @12:50 pm  

Why on Earth would you be ashamed of these toys? They’re a snapshot of history. Yes, they were fun when they were originally made. (Excluding the Obama sock monkey.) Society changes. To look at history through the morals and mores of today is ridiculous. Put it into context instead, and view it as what was commonplace then and compare it to how far we’ve come as a society. In 50 years, will they look back at how we live today and be horrified by how we treat (fill in the blank)?

AbVag
July 15th, 2008 @12:55 pm  

Interesting list. Amazing to know what was acceptable then. Course, I’ve always known it, but it’s a good reminder. It should also serve reminding what really is racism and what is using the race card. The majority of things today deemed racist are not racist, but used as such by evolved racists either unaware they’ve become what they detest or racists using their minority status for selfish gain. It’s for that reason why “hate speech” laws are unconstitutional.

Are what you listed an exception to my stance against hate speech laws? No. Why? Because today’s society can take care of such racism without the need for government involvement. I think the Obama puppet is proof of that. They put it up, the people gave them a justifiable tongue-lashing, they correct their error and remove it. That’s the way it should be.

Alison
July 15th, 2008 @12:59 pm  

There’s a game that Parker Brothers put out in the late 19th century called “Heathen Chinee”– a card game where each card depicts a stereotypical “Chinee” character. I’ve seen a couple of these, one printed in the 1870s, one in the 1890s….
What I wonder about is what we take for granted now that will look outrageous to people 150-200 years from now– “how could they have been so dense?” There’s plenty to choose from.

Dave Carrol
July 15th, 2008 @1:43 pm  

Wow!

That’s brutal!

Jeepers

Etna
July 15th, 2008 @2:03 pm  

I think our current president looks more like a monkey than potential candidate (and hopefully future president!) Obama.

Thanks for the post, I had no idea horrible things like this had ever existed.

uri
July 15th, 2008 @2:13 pm  

By your exaggerated disgusted comments and by the topic you chose for this post(after all you must have some interest in racism) i do deduct that you are a racist after all. your guilt however denies your authentic enthusiastic comments and force you to politically correct dull faked “shocked” responses for each of the item.

Cooter
July 15th, 2008 @2:26 pm  

i wish these toys were around when i was a kid!

lucas
July 15th, 2008 @2:44 pm  

When most of these toys were made, racism wasn’t an opinion, it was fact. All the whites knew that the blacks were “n-words” (sorry, I chickened out). The blacks were completely voiceless and had just about as much power as dogs.

It’s amazing that line of thinking ever flourished at all, almost more amazing that it has taken that long for us to come this far. I know that racism still exists in this country, even among “normal” people (not toothless West Virginians of whom you’d expect that line of thinking) but I feel that someday, it will be completely gone.

Black and white are not separate races, anyway you look at it we are all people with the exact same problems, concerns, joys and hopes. We all evolved from the same monkeys.

dmac
July 15th, 2008 @2:57 pm  

I find it amazing how much the world has changed, I wonder if they had such “toys” in the medival times or even roman.

john hegedus
July 15th, 2008 @3:18 pm  

I used to own one of the ‘greedy nigger boy’ money boxes way back in the 50s and, as a child, I just thought of it as ‘my money box’. Growing up in the North of England I had never even SEEN a black person so it meant nothing to me then in the way of racism. When I came across it a few years ago, though, lurking in the attic and read the ‘Jolly Nigger Boy’ inscription on the back I have to say I was shocked and horrified!

What I am saying is that times have changed. My parents would not have given me that money box if they had known it would offend people. They were the most tolerant people I ever knew and I, myself went on to have many black friends at college. To us, it was just a moneybox! Fashions change. We used to be careful to call black people ‘coloured’ as that was considered ‘correct’ at the time. Nowadays that term is considered offensive.

Surely, all that matters is that we love and respect one another regardless of race or creed. The language is just a matter of fashion.

ROb
July 15th, 2008 @3:41 pm  

Like how it has 88 diggs.

Heil Hitler!

Fool
July 15th, 2008 @3:42 pm  

Yes things at one time were a lot different. I can remember buying the candy at the corner drug store in New York called nigger babies. Even the black kids I played with called them that. Was that a simpler time or was we just dumb and uncaring?

Kevin
July 15th, 2008 @3:54 pm  

Why are you still spreading this hate? I suppose putting a disclaimer at the top saying “I don’t agree with what any of these toys say” makes it ok does it? You rascists make me sick!

Steve
July 15th, 2008 @3:59 pm  

Why is it ‘racist’ if the toy depicts a dark skinned person??? There are millions of simillar toys with white faces - are these not racist?

I’m confused!

billy-jo
July 15th, 2008 @4:51 pm  

where can i get the obama-monkey toy?!! it’s brilliant! hahah

RM
July 15th, 2008 @4:58 pm  

This just shows how ungodly ignorant people have been. I was horrified. Whether you call them artifacts or toys or whatever, they’re a disgrace. Too bad we can’t make degrading toys based on the assholes who invented this trash.

Adolf Jr.
July 15th, 2008 @5:02 pm  

I think these toys should be brought back. I mean, seriously, they give moral values and proper ideas where such said things should forever remain! :D

J.R.
July 15th, 2008 @5:05 pm  

O.O

I am really surprised that someone made something like that about Barack Obama.

To be honest, I am surprised that any of this ever came out, but whatev.

jerk
July 15th, 2008 @5:15 pm  

funny as hell

Dottsy
July 15th, 2008 @5:17 pm  

Thank you for posting this. As a black woman, it’s a reminder of how out and out racist things were back in the day, and there are even some reminders that it’s still out there today. Whew!

Dennis
July 15th, 2008 @5:21 pm  

boy, these do kinda make you ashamed to even see and read the names on them.

old stuff that was popular at one time and certainly not appropriate today.

sad to say, i’ll bet these would fetch a good price on eBay.

Jesus
July 15th, 2008 @5:22 pm  

Would they be considered racist, if these toys depicted white people, and sold in Africa?

Mitch
July 15th, 2008 @5:24 pm  

These toys are hilarious. I love it!! How funny! I must get my hands on these. I would play with them all day long.

Ymer
July 15th, 2008 @5:28 pm  

I’m not sure how to say this but I actually have no. 9 sitting in my bookcase right now. The gold on his shirt is white on mine but that’s definitely the one. I was actually a young child when I got it so, er… I don’t think I grew up to be a racist at least.

I gotta go think about “stuff”…

mary
July 15th, 2008 @5:29 pm  

blatant racism doesnt usually offend me but something about these “toys” reeeeaaaly pisses me off. Earlier this year I actually saw a gollywog in a shop in Paddington Station in London.

dcosta
July 15th, 2008 @5:37 pm  

I really don’t see why someone would be offended by the fact that these toys were presented here. Have we as a society become so sensitive that we can not muster up the courage to even look at something that might offend us?

I do agree that they are racist, but am I so offended that I can’t even look at them?

No.

lmao
July 15th, 2008 @5:46 pm  

lmao, im half black and some of this shit is amazing
hahahahhh

Joanne
July 15th, 2008 @5:53 pm  

wow… this stuff is rather shocking. :(

Project2501a
July 15th, 2008 @5:56 pm  

You guys should see Spike Lee’s “Bamboozled”. In the film Lee shows some of his items in his collections that show off the racist substrate.

Dean
July 15th, 2008 @6:27 pm  

I don’t feel that you can call number 8 racist considering http://www.bushorchimp.com/ ,
http://www.funnyjunk.com/pages/monkey.htm ,
http://www.flumesday.com/images/bush/monkey.jpg ,
unless you consider bush being portrayed as a monkey racist too.

Kero
July 15th, 2008 @6:49 pm  

As a little girl, my grandmother gave me a Mammy doll. A mammy doll is a dark skinned (african) doll, dressed more or less in traditional plantation style clothing. I don’t know why she got me that doll, I suspect her reasons did border on racist when I reflect on it. Thankfully her foul intentions totally backfired.

I adored that doll growing up. It wasn’t a ragdoll type, it was a rubber/plastic doll with amber eyes that opened/closed when you tilted the doll. She had refined features, modest-yet-lovely makeup accents, perfectly curled shiny black tresses (spiral curled hair), The headcloth was a beautiful silk and had a pretty pattern, the dangling hoop earings looked lovely and sophisticated. Her dress was simple, but refined. To a child who was (and still is) color blind, she was fantastic. My barbie dolls were boring in comparison.

The toys here though? Terrrible. Strange how backwards we all were, a very short time ago.

thatguy
July 15th, 2008 @6:56 pm  

“Whilst not as obviously racist as the rest of the toys…”

Actually this comment makes YOU look bad. That toy is in no way racist.

Hitler persecuted the Jews and there is NOTHING racial about being Jewish. Unless you’re a Nazi and actually believe Jews are their own race I guess…

I’d suggest changing your comment. btw, I happen to be German and not Jewish.

billy bob nigger fac
July 15th, 2008 @7:01 pm  

haha not funny nigger toys.

Charles
July 15th, 2008 @7:16 pm  

OMG!!!
I can’t stop laughing!

Rei
July 15th, 2008 @7:20 pm  

Weren’t Golly wog’s in old episodes of Noddy? I can remember them…

Laugh at it All
July 15th, 2008 @7:23 pm  

While I would in no way ever endorse, or buy “toys” like these, I did get a good laugh at the expense of the ignorant people that created them. I am a bit shocked that in the year 2008 that the Obama sock doll was created, and can only write that one off to knuckle draggers who still can’t transcend ignorance.
Anyway, great collection of historic ignorance, preserve it well, those who don’t know their history…

bingbong
July 15th, 2008 @7:36 pm  

I am surprised to see golly wog as #1.
I remember I had one when I was little.
Didn’t mean I associated it with negative portrayal of people with darker skin than mine.

Being Australian I don’t really have any connection with black slavery. But I do know that Australian settlers and previous generations used to shoot abo’s.
In the end we are all a bunch of bastards, wogs, limey whiteys usually ignorant and scared of people different than ourselves.
Let’s let go of our egos and stop being so offended. Love yourself and love others. Acept people as people.

english girl
July 15th, 2008 @8:21 pm  

I grew up in England. Myself and all my cousins had golliwogs. Not just dolls but also pins and other such things. At the time, it was just a doll to me, not blatently racist, because it was made so differently from some of my other dolls. Later, absolutely I recognized the difference and sadly don’t have my golliwog anymore. I would have liked to have kept it as a testimony to the way things have changed for the better. Later as a child, I also had a native indian doll, and a brown skinned doll that was constructed the same way my other dolls were. But I do miss my golliwog….

Tony
July 15th, 2008 @9:15 pm  

Where can I buy these? Seriously though, why dig through the archives to find examples of racism? Why not just attempt to let the healing begin? Do we honestly need to go back through the past to dredge up reasons to hate? If we can’t get along, the terrorists have already won. I seriously want one of those banks though.

Jerome Washington
July 15th, 2008 @10:29 pm  

Man, these toys are funny. As a black man, I feel as if people have lost their sence of humor and need to quit being so damn serious all of the time! “Niggas be aktin crazy!”

john boy
July 15th, 2008 @10:32 pm  

so where can i purchase the toys at?

Dave and Thomas
July 15th, 2008 @10:43 pm  

This is a crazy assortment of toys from a (hopefully) lost era. I just finished reading a book that reference Golly Wog and now it makes more sense.

jesse j
July 16th, 2008 @12:25 am  

This is the perfect christmas list.

Joonas K.
July 16th, 2008 @12:31 am  

I’m a racist, hahahaa. I like these toys. They should be forever a reminder that black people should be at the farm working their asses off while white folk (the good folk) sit at the porch and drink lemonade.

White powaah!!!

Alan
July 16th, 2008 @12:50 am  

I wonder if the sock puppet was George Bush if it would still be for sale?

I remember jars of Jam in the UK with the Golliwog on a few years ago.

Jim
July 16th, 2008 @2:15 am  

Nobody should be offended by these. They were from a time in our past when such blatant racism was commonplace and even encouraged in some places. I don’t even blame the people from yesteryear as they were quite ignorant. But what we should take away from looking at these is the fact that we have come a long way and to remember the mistakes of the past. Not forget them. We can’t change history, only make sure that such ignorance never happens again. If not for ourselves then for our children at least.

craig
July 16th, 2008 @2:22 am  

“Displayed a violence against blacks that was acceptable at the time, and was also thought of as “fun”.”

How moronic.

So if the character was white…Would it “Display a violence against whites that was acceptable at the time?”

It’s not racist. It’s a fucking horse kicking off a man. It’s classic slapstick.

Grow up and stop painting every toy and novelty with a 100 y/o black character “racist.”

claire stokoe
July 16th, 2008 @2:55 am  

It’s astonishing that this was ever considered normal? i’m laughing uncompfortably at them as it is increadulous when this kind of ignorance is uncovered.

Great find, really makes you think!

Johnny Darko
July 16th, 2008 @3:03 am  

funny, theyre pretty much all products of white people.

N
July 16th, 2008 @3:06 am  

Interesting point about the golliwogs. They first appeared in an Enid Blyton book back in the 50s, as the bullies who picked on Noddy. Interestingly, gollys (since, according to the last info I found on the subject, only the “wog” part is actually offensive :-S) can still be found in some reprints of the books, and on certain jars of jam, but as happy, kind, helpful figures. The bullies have now become green-faced goblins.

Getoveryourselves..
July 16th, 2008 @3:13 am  

Not only White people were / are racists against blacks/african americans…

Calum Kegner
July 16th, 2008 @4:00 am  

What’s wrong with the hitler limousine. I have one of those.

jibbs
July 16th, 2008 @6:25 am  

My mum has one of those money boxes still in the attic. No.9.

Hannah
July 16th, 2008 @6:40 am  

I remember having a “gollywog” when I was a little girl, and I’m not even thirty. I can’t speak for the values of my grandma who knitted it, but I know that as far as I was concerned, it was just like my other ragdolls, but black. I guess the racism of gollywogs exists only as far as the values of the adult people in my life who had opinions on those things. In my 4 year old head, people being valued differently for the way they look, was fortunately beyond my scope of understanding.

I suppose that, because the concept of black slaves, or for that matter, race stereotypes, was something I only learned of much much later, gollywogs never seemed racist to me. I can see how they are racist now, but as a kid I’m glad I was so innocent.

Chvad SB
July 16th, 2008 @6:50 am  

Great post. If you watch the end of “Bamboozled” there are a number of shots of these types of toys. It’s pretty creepy to think this stuff was/is somehow seen as fun.

Nigel Ater
July 16th, 2008 @7:03 am  

I think they accurately portray the fact that coloureds are a sub-species that have still to adapt to a life full of subtle looks, turns of phrase and gestures that you find in todays western worlds. Im afraid that they were just taken from their more primitive environment before they had properly evolved to deal with european and american lives.

TopTenz
July 16th, 2008 @7:36 am  

This is a very interesting and shocking list. Wish I had thought of it for my site. Excellent work. How did you find these? Google search?

Broax
July 16th, 2008 @8:35 am  

I’m portuguese and I’m very embarassed to have a portuguese toy in this list (”Jogo Dos Grooms”). Keep in mind that by the time that game was published we where in the middle of a opressive regime that was on war against our african collonies and we’ve come a long way since those days…

Why majora?! Why?

bob
July 16th, 2008 @10:41 am  

haha its sooooooooooooo funny

Darkman
July 16th, 2008 @10:44 am  

These toys were considered fun for the same reason they are now considered offensive — the social climate. Being politically correct is the current flavor. 100 years ago you would have laughed at a black man’s head being kicked in by a donkey in the same way you now find it repulsive.

poopnuggets
July 16th, 2008 @10:46 am  
Leonardo Boiko
July 16th, 2008 @12:42 pm  

I find #4 to be most interesting. It’s not hateful at all — it’s actually kind, gentle, even compassionate. But that doesn’t change the fact that it’s incredibly, stupidly condescending and racist. You oten see this kind of “compassion” racism today with regards to native people, but not often to blacks.

mona
July 16th, 2008 @1:02 pm  

i always thought golly wogs were really cute… im not racist, but they look so sweet..my friend had one at school but she had it taken off her, she was very upset, she loved it to bits :(

SparklieSunShine
July 16th, 2008 @1:41 pm  

The toys are quite racist, but I find reading through the comments more shocking. I don’t find the list humorous. It is interesting and disgusting.

I am equally disgusted by the feeling that it was cute and somehow alright because that is how things were. I think it is something that we should be embarrassed about. I think it is something to be shamed by.

You may have fond memories wrapped up in say your childhood love of a “mammie” doll, but you can not deny the racist significance of a woman being forced to work and care for white children while her unable to properly care for her own children. Then we make it into a toy and suddenly she is so sweet.

Oh and I am a fellow German to the one commenter above and while classifying Jews as a race is still in debate you cannot deny that they aren’t the victims of racism. Can you think of a joke about Jewish people off the top of your head? I think you probably can. I agree with the cars inclusion. That was a dark time in world history. It is also something in my own cultural history I find shame in and I believe it is good to have shame about that. It is shameful.

I’m not trying to make this into a big deal. I just saw the toys and was taken aback, but what people used to make and then the comments got to me.

SparklieSunShine
July 16th, 2008 @1:47 pm  

Can I also add that nothing about toys featuring black babies during that time period were made to be sweet. Don’t forget about ads at the time, this one (http://www.authentichistory.com/diversity/african/alligator/1920sc_Little_African_Dainty_Morsel.html) is from 1920 for licorice candies.

It also now serves the purpose of reminding how babies were also made to work; as bait to catch alligators.

So think about that the next time you find the little baby in the (ahem) watermellon cute.

SparklieSunShine
July 16th, 2008 @1:58 pm  

I swear I am not trying to be a troll or whatever and flood the comments. I just think it is very important that people know the stories behind these things. Earlier I wrote an (ahem) before writing watermelon and that is because I thought the in itself was racist, but I wanted to look it up first. Sure enough:

“Numerous primary sources chroncle Black resistance to slavery through “silent sabotage,” or, day-to-day acts of resistance. Stealing from the master was one example. It seems logical that, given that food would be among the most desirable of items a slave would pilfer, and chickens and watermelons would have been commonly available. Solomon Northup, for example, tells of being put in charge of punishing slaves who got into the master’s watermelon patch. Rather than carry out the punishment, Northup had the slaves show him the way to the patch. The connecting of Blacks to chicken and watermelon was done in a way to dehumanize Blacks and subject them to ridicule. This process helped contribute to prejudice and discrimination. Surprisingly, many young people are unaware of the long history of these stereotypes, while some older Black people refuse to eat watermelon because of that history. And yet the stereotype still exists.”

Further info and plenty of examples of racist imagery featuring watermelons can be found here: http://www.authentichistory.com/diversity/african/chickenwatermelon/index.html

Entz
July 16th, 2008 @2:14 pm  

Golly Wogs are racist against native Australians as opposed to Africans.

Alexander Cain
July 16th, 2008 @2:41 pm  

I’d like to have #9 for my desk at work, but some goddamned nigger would probably cry about it. That’s all those darkies down here are good for.

DJK
July 16th, 2008 @3:14 pm  

In response to Nigel’s comment on Africans and being taken from their ‘primitive environment’, I urge you to consider and ponder where where every other race came to get education on science, math, agriculture, etc. Ever heard of the Pyramids? Still standing huh? No ladders, cranes, and other so-called “european inventions”.

Ohh…you must think Aristotle and Socrates came up with all of that on their own…lol. I’m sorry. Do your research before you talk about how primitive Africans are. I mean, it’s the Motherland, the start of man and CIVILization. Why do you think so many companies are over there raping the land for ALL of its diamons, iron, silver, oil, etc.? It’s where it all started.

Muu
July 16th, 2008 @4:32 pm  

I was thinking how silly these toys were when I saw them. I was thinking what a strange bit of historical artifact these were. I thought that they were interesting, and obviously racist. I was thinking that I’m glad we don’t live in such racially motivated times.

However, I then read some of the comments and realized how racist and race oriented we are still. People obviously can’t handle racism, even from a bygone era as they feel the need to either lampoon, defend, or rebuttal. Why can’t you take it just as it is? Why can’t you look at it and say “Wow, that was racist. I’m sure glad I don’t live in those racist times.”? You all make me sick at the fact that race is so prevalent in your minds.

Obviously the poster posted this as a way to show how much out society has changed. Apparently that was lost.

Chris Laxton
July 16th, 2008 @6:33 pm  

that obama doll looks like it may be a Paul Frank monkey. which would be kinda even more funny, cause Paul probably never even put two and two together till he had them all made up and was so happy and excited, and then he goes to show all his closest friends for the first time, tellin them about this cute new obama inspired doll, and they get a sneak peek before it gets shipped to stores, and he pulls it from behind his back and they all look at each other and then the ground and are all like ‘uhhh paul…’

Tony
July 16th, 2008 @7:51 pm  

The Obama sock puppet wasn’t racist, they made one for McCain too and no one complained about that one!

What you have to be “African American” to be eligible to pull the race card?

Its just stupid and people need to find something else to waste their time on, I don’t want to hear it.

mmm
July 16th, 2008 @9:17 pm  

Where can I buy these toys? They are all hilarious.

ME
July 16th, 2008 @10:45 pm  

Well, this is funny, not the racism, but the way the people put the things… If any of these toys were about white people, nobody would complain…
The racism is inside yourselves

anon
July 16th, 2008 @11:04 pm  

Well I thought that the obama toy was quite cool and not very racist. THat example is very subjective and if yo think that is racist then wait till you the picture of me with a head scarf.
Fuck your political correctness, we are all from the same blood

mo
July 16th, 2008 @11:20 pm  

It is not racist of you to post this. You are presenting a bit of history that we should not forget. No, they’re not something to be proud of, but we need to remind ourselves that some progress has been made and we have more to go. I would never consider censoring this post, I would caution that those who forget history are doomed to repeat it…

Dave
July 16th, 2008 @11:37 pm  

The monkey-in-a-suit one was pretty funny. The bank, too.

As for the whole “racist” thing… you know, don’t be a dick.

wit
July 17th, 2008 @3:03 am  

All the comments section needs is a replacement of half the comments with WHITE POWER — which is what these “durrr dahurrr hurrrrrr but there are white stereotypes why doesn’t anyone get offended by those but us?” people really want to say.

admin
July 17th, 2008 @3:08 am  

To David and the other racist comment makers, I will be deleting your comments if I feel they offend me.

It’s my blog so my call.

wit
July 17th, 2008 @3:17 am  

Seriously I’m not seeing enough ASCII swastikas here accompanying gems such as:

“Why is it okay to refer to the current president as a monkey but not one of the presidential hopefuls? Please answer that question without mentioning race/ethnicity”

What’s going on?

DfromShmups
July 17th, 2008 @3:59 am  

Racists are always so deep in denial saying stuff like: “I’m not racist, but yadda yadda yadda”.
And yes, I’m deeply emberassed by racists. They offend my intelligence as a human being.

Binx
July 17th, 2008 @4:28 am  

I think you should remove the Obama doll, or put it in context at least.

The doll was made in Japan which consider the monkey the smarter animals and not as a negative slang word for a black person. Although it is no longer on sale, they did realise the connotations of the animal in the west.

Do you still consider it racist or a cultural misunderstanding?

Binx
July 17th, 2008 @4:29 am  

I think you should remove the Obama doll, or put it in context at least.

The doll was made in Japan which consider the monkey the smarter animals and not as a negative slang word for a black person. Although it is no longer on sale, they did not realise the connotations of the animal in the west.

Do you still consider it racist or a cultural misunderstanding?

MICKoWAR
July 17th, 2008 @4:37 am  

Hahaha these are classics, I bet some of them would be worth a fair penny too! =D

As for the whole racist thing, its idiots who point out the differences by saying “na thats racist dont say that, the black/asian/what ever/white guy even will take offence to it!”

Unless ofcourse its pure outright racism which isnt what im talking about. But as far as saying im gonna get gook food or what not, if you find that offensive your an idiot!

Oh and on that note the person im basically married to of many many years is ASIAN!! :P just before some sook starts having a whinge at me lol

mniepnapp
July 17th, 2008 @5:19 am  

Answering “Why is it okay to refer to the current president as a monkey but not one of the presidential hopefuls? Please answer that question without mentioning race/ethnicity” correctly:
Because, in the first case, the monkey image is mostly based on character, intellect and false pride, in the second one on appearance, which could be seen as a low, childish insult.

Коля
July 17th, 2008 @6:06 am  

А че, прикольна!

bob
July 17th, 2008 @8:11 am  

hahaah hillarious

cloistered
July 17th, 2008 @8:42 am  

I’m so sick of ugly-minded people comparing monkeys to black people. Have you seen the statistics on monkey crime? Almost negligible. And monkeys do significantly worse on SAT scores (but that may just be institutional bias in favor of black people). And finally, monkeys create very little of the world’s crappy music or unfunny sitcoms. Please lay off the monkeys.

empanada
July 17th, 2008 @8:49 am  

What about the worst example of racism ever- Tickle-Me Elmo. The single most disastrous thing that has ever happened to the cause of Muppet equality.

Andelle
July 17th, 2008 @9:30 am  

We actually had number 9 in my store. A black lady bought it and told us it reminded her of her brother. Lol.

I kid you not.

I work in an antique store, by the way.

tl
July 17th, 2008 @11:09 am  

Why is it that white people are the ones who are always tapped as racists? There is plenty of that to go around in every ethnicity. Being white, black, Asian, Mexican, whatever, there are lots and lots of racists regardless of the color of your skin or the shape of your eyes. Try having a white TV awards show, or a white college scholarship. How about a white Miss USA competition, nope can’t do it it’s racist, it’s ok for other ethnicities to have those things, but not for white people, nope, no way, racist. Hmmmm seems racist to me. Then of course you have the glorious Rev. Jackson plastered all over the news for using the “n” word when he thought nobody was listening, just like Don Imus did on his radio program, he caught holy hell, turn about is fair play, should we silence the Reverend just like Imus was, fair is fair, but nope if that happens it’s white people being racist again….. It’s quite a conundrum don’t you think? It’s a shame everyone can’t put on their big person panties and get along.

Tiffany
July 17th, 2008 @11:04 pm  

okay you want to know why it would be racist for white people to do that? because white people were racist for thousands of years! there were white schools, white colleges, white bathrooms, white drinking fountains. its about damn time that there was stuff for other ethnicities. its good there is now a time for other ethnicities to be ahead not just white people. white people, kicked, killed, spit on, segregated, other races for years so now that they have something to be proud of don’t try &make is racist cuz they deserve it right about now I think

jake
July 18th, 2008 @5:17 am  

Haha, ohh tiffany. It’s the sad people like you that ensure that racism will never ever go away. I don’t know about you, but there are plenty of white people around today that absolutely do NOT ‘deserve’ to be stepped on because of the color of their skin. Maybe we live in different parts of the country.

Yes, I agree that these items are offensive. But they are valuable anthropological artifacts. They show us how bad it can get.

So do me a favor. Step away from your parents and their parents on this one. Be an individual and see people for something other than their skin. I’ll do the same. We’re getting a lot better, don’t go back now.

jjneall
July 18th, 2008 @6:28 am  

Two of the biggest racist alive (not to mention egomaniacs) are the Rev Jessie Jackson and Uncle Al Sharpton both, can I say this without offending, black. So racist come in all sizes, shapes and yes folks colors.

hah
July 18th, 2008 @8:22 am  

Why dont they still sell stuff like this? I want each one of these items.

Lisa
July 18th, 2008 @9:31 am  

these have all cracked me up, the ones i would buy would be the hitlers limousine, or the greedy nigger boy money box…genius!

LipSync
July 18th, 2008 @11:19 am  

Tiffany. And you don’t think that it went the other way as well? Are you even aware that blacks had black slaves also? This is just a tip of the iceberg. And there is no way that I am going to teach you about it all. You people can only do that yourselves.

Read and learn.

Child Of God!
July 18th, 2008 @1:38 pm  

“What Goes Around - Comes Around” Every Hateful Heart Will Go Straight To HELL On Judgement Day!!!

Stefan
July 18th, 2008 @5:45 pm  

wtf the golly wog wasnt based on any black person. and i dont understand how all u people think its us WHITES being raciest, god created adam and eve who were WHITE!

Then monkeys came along and so did every one else including white people i think that the world we live in today is so f-ing bad people killing other people for the colour of their skin like one man said:

I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.”

I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia, the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.

I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

I have a dream today!

I have a dream that one day, down in Alabama, with its vicious racists, with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of “interposition” and “nullification” — one day right there in Alabama little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers.

I have a dream today!

I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, and every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight; “and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed and all flesh shall see it together.”

now this was said by Martin Luther King Jr and still today he has had an effect on the black peoples community and white so research says

all im trying to say is that White, Black, Asian ect should all live together in harmony

thank you for reading
X x X x X x X x X x X
GOD BLESS

Albert Kaholic
July 18th, 2008 @6:37 pm  

Actually, I think Adam and Eve weren’t really white, more of a Mocha-Latte sorta dark beige.

Westie
July 18th, 2008 @11:31 pm  

I’m surprised at how many people are saying that these are a good example of how ignorant and racist white people were in the past and how it was amazing that black people were treated and viewed like this.

Yet no-one has mentioned that racism and prejudice is just as prevalent today and only the faces have changed. Doesn’t seem too long ago that muslims and arabs were a fair and publicly accepted target despite the vast majority of the them just being ordinary people too.

Andrew
July 19th, 2008 @5:47 am  

Great post. There are a bunch of cartoons as well over on archive.org that would not be tolerated these days.

Idris
July 19th, 2008 @6:35 am  

Stefan, ur retarded if u say that gollywog wasnt based off a black person. (yes im black)

bob
July 19th, 2008 @8:11 am  

it isn’t. the term
Golly Wog is used many times in Japanese movies and culture and is a get this dust bunny. for example there’s a children’s movie called Totoro now i find when cleaning dust bunnies they arent in fact people african descent or not

Anonim-o
July 19th, 2008 @10:29 am  

i guess all this resent was cuz of the whole slavery thing… Mexicans went through the same thing!!! even worse!!! but we were smart enough to charge them for the work lol

john hegedus
July 19th, 2008 @11:38 am  

dmac

I am not sure if there were toys like this in the middle ages but you only have to read Shakespeare (Othello and Merchant of Venice, to name but two) to know that racism existed in the 1500s.

It is a sad fact that members of the human race always want to feel superior. Those who are at the bottom of the pile will always try to find someone to persecute.

I really dont think these toys are important though, in themselves. Most people who bought them were not racists. To them, they were just toys the same as Barbie and Action Man.

yaputcha leflegin
July 19th, 2008 @7:19 pm  

Q: What are the black things in between african elephant’s toes?

A: Slow niggers

skyebird
July 19th, 2008 @7:28 pm  

Do you understand that all comedy is based on cruel jokes. Blacks are the most underdeveloped of all races on comedy, only surpassed by Muslems. (they are not a race) so “get over it!”

Nathan McLaughlin
July 19th, 2008 @9:20 pm  

q. what do you call a white male?
a. racist

yes, im black (mixed race, but all the same…)

Yea yea
July 19th, 2008 @9:48 pm  

Before we can ever eliminate blatant racism, we have to eliminate people’s tendency to let their race define their personality. So many in the world allow their color to define the way they will act, what music they listen to, and to define their personality. It is ridiculous that any black person in the south who does not act ghetto, listen to rap, and like women for their physical appearance only is shunned and labeled as a white black guy. We need to eliminate racism, but we also need to eliminate the undertones of race in our personalities. I believe you can retain your culture without allowing it to limit you.

WhiteWoman
July 19th, 2008 @11:17 pm  

I am a 44 year old white woman raised in California and living in Oregon.
I WISH we still had slaves because I want one!
Blacks act different than us whites. Period. So do Mexicans and I’m sure other races like Filipinos but none act as bad as blacks. They are not as intelligent as the white race (as a whole). Yes, there are dumb whites that act retarded. And a few blacks that act intelligent. But overall, the black race acts like idiots and their place is serving us whites. I really wish it was still that way. That’s the way it should be and I will be forever bummed that I missed out on that great era when blacks were in their place.

WhiteMan
July 19th, 2008 @11:54 pm  

I agree with WhiteWoman’s comment below. I also think woman should be put back in their place and should not be allowed to vote or have any rights. (end of sarcasm)

Get with it lady.

- A young white male

WhiteManII
July 20th, 2008 @12:41 am  

Nathan McLaughlin, I certainley hope that you realized how rascist that joke you made was even if you are trying to make a point. That is known as generalization and is not a fair judgement to make.

And WhiteWoman, my best wishes are for you and I hope that you find the mental help you so greatly need soon.

WhiteWoman
July 20th, 2008 @12:55 am  

Thomas Jefferson owned slaves all his life. Did he need mental help WhiteManII?
Lots of great men owned slaves.
And btw WhiteMan, I have no more rights than a slave myself and I’m already “in my place” so I don’t see your point here….

Coco
July 20th, 2008 @1:28 am  

white woman

u r a sad ignorent lady that needs to get educated! yes white ppl can be stupid YOU ARE 1 OF THEM i think its disgusting what you have said! ppl are ppl skin color may be different but…. were all human!!!

Ectes
July 20th, 2008 @1:36 am  

Heh.
Most of the comments here are the real reason racism (as many people here are defining it) wont go away.

It’s a two way street. I mean, if a black guy gets a promotion at work despite being inferior to a white man, it’s this so called ‘affirmative action’.

C’mon. Call a shovel a shovel. Its giving someone special attention based on their race. Isnt that the definition of racism?

Yes these things happened. In RETROSPECT, they were unfair to a particular race. I like to think that we live in a more tolerant society (although some people still like to cling to the old ways and its them that make the newspapers) and the idea of racism has changed in definition.

The day rappers stop using the word nigger because its “offensive” is the day I will think about being offended by it.

Stop playing into the hypocrisy inherent in a system where we always seem to run everything past every last minority to make sure that its PC and ok to post/publish/say. I’m willing to bet that no matter what anyone, anywhere says, someone else will take offense to it.

Racism is only an idea based on history and our PC-heavy world. I say, say what you want and if someone gets touchy with it, sort it out between the two of you.

–Ectes

Latex Santa
July 20th, 2008 @3:35 am  

Racism is not “a thing of the past”. It has merely evolved into something more subtle and often undefinable. People need to put the times these toys were produced in into perspective, and consider that the Bible does not cite colour anywhere. Think about where Jesus “lived”. Would he really have been white? Really? You get culturally blind people all over, particularly (though I hate to have to point this out) in America - and yes, I have been there…

Shaden
July 20th, 2008 @3:50 am  

sadly racism is never going to go away by what I´ve seen the way we live today in America is a good as its going to be tolerant but with many racist undertones. i say its never going to go away because many parts of the world are still very racist way more then here, i am a Mexican American who my whole life has gone to Mexico on vacations to visit family and never understood why the other Mexicans would risk t